How that Iranian missile strike into Syria turned out to be a massive failure

Iran's missile strike on the Islamic State on June 18 appears to have been a massive failure, after only two of the seven missiles fired actually hit their targets.

Two of the Zolfaqar short-range missiles missed their targets in Syria by several miles, while three others did not even make it out of Iraqi airspace, according to Haaretz. Despite the apparent failures, Iranian state-affiliated media heralded the attacks as a success, referring to them as a "new and major" stage in the country's fight against ISIS.

The strike was "a great deal less impressive than the media noise being made in Iran around the launch," Israeli military sources told Haaretz.

Iranian legislators claimed the strike was also a sign to the US that Iran's ballistic missile program will not be deterred by sanctions.

Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, a radical paramilitary wing, claimed it conducted the strikes in response to ISIS's attack in Tehran earlier this month.

Iran's larger, longer-range missiles have struggled with accuracy problems in the past, as many lack global positioning satellite receivers. The Zolfaqar missiles, a derivative of the Fateh-110 heavy artillery rocket, were fired from Iran's western provinces, likely in an effort to maximize range and accuracy. June 18th's strike was the first use of the missiles in combat, meaning it could have been as much a test as anything else. Iran has a large and diverse ballistic missile arsenal with weapons that comparatively more developed than the Zolfaqar.