--- title: "Why the Navy SEALs chose the SIG Sauer P226 over the M9" description: "Some units prefer the M9 or the greater stopping power of the M1911A1’s .45 ACP, but the Navy SEALs adopted the Sig P226 instead." date: "2023-07-25" modified: "2023-07-25" authors: - name: "Miguel Ortiz" job_title: "Senior Contributor, Army Veteran" link: "https://www.wearethemighty.com/authors/miguelortiz/" url: "https://www.wearethemighty.com/tactical/why-the-navy-seals-chose-the-sig-sauer-p226-over-the-m9/" categories: - "History" - "Navy" - "Special Operations" - "Tactical" - "Weapons" --- # Why the Navy SEALs chose the SIG Sauer P226 over the M9 ![navy sig p226]() *(U.S. Navy)* In 1985, the U.S. military adopted the Beretta 92FS as the M9. [Replacing the M1911A1]() as the standard sidearm of America’s armed forces, the M9 was issued to all service branches. However, not all of the nation’s warfighters carried the Beretta. Army Special Forces preferred the greater stopping power of the M1911A1’s .45 ACP and continued issuing the pistol. Meanwhile, the Navy SEALs adopted the Beretta’s competitor. ![m9 army rangers]() **The M9 was used by the U.S. Army Rangers as well as Special Forces (U.S. Army)** During the handgun trials to replace the M1911A1, the [Beretta proved itself to be exceptionally reliable](). In a 1977 test, it experienced just one failure in 2,000 rounds fired compared to the 1911 which experienced one failure every 748 rounds. Seven years later, under the XM9 program, the Beretta achieved 1,750 mean rounds between failures compared to the 1911’s 162. However, in that same test, another pistol went 2,877 mean rounds between failures. ![m9 in the navy]() **The M9 remains in service with the Navy as the service phases in the M17/M18 (U.S. Navy)** Like the Beretta 92, the SIG Sauer P226 is a double/single-action 9mm pistol. Throughout the 1984 test, the SIG was the only entry that posed serious competition to the Beretta. At the conclusion of the test, the P226 actually beat the 92 with an overall score of 853.6 compared to the 92’s score of 835.34. However, on November 20, 1984, the Army issued a request for best and final offers from the competitors. While [SIG Sauer]() maintained its bid, Beretta lowered its unit price by 18%. With a lower price, Beretta increased their score to 858 while SIG’s score fell to 847. As a result, Beretta won the contract. ![navy eod m9]() **Navy EOD fielded both the M9 and Mk25 (U.S. Navy)** Like the rest of the Navy, the SEALs received the M9 and got to work testing it for themselves. However, they soon ran into problems with the new pistol. SEAL teams reported slide cracks in their M9s and even had catastrophic failures that split the pistol’s slide during firing. No injuries were reported, but the M9 was taken out of service with the teams. Instead, the SEALs adopted a maritime version of the P226, designated the Mk25 Mod 0. ![seals with pistols]() **The SEALs have since replaced their SIGs with Glocks (U.S. Navy)** During the subsequent investigation, it was discovered that the M9 was not at fault. Rather, the 9mm submachine gun ammunition used by the SEALs fired at a higher pressure was the cause of the slide failures. Despite this finding, the M9 was not readopted by the SEALs, who continued fielding the Mk25 until the adoption of the [Glock 19]() as the Mk27. ## Author Miguel Ortiz is a Senior Contributor for We Are The Mighty covering primarily military news and history with an emphasis on weapons technology. He is a former active duty Army officer and remains a member of the Army IRR. After commissioning through San Diego State University Army ROTC, Miguel served with the 10th Mountain Division at Fort Drum, NY. He has written for We Are The Mighty since 2020, drawing from his passion for the military community and history. Miguel’s work has also been seen on Business Insider and The Blast. He remains an avid shooter, competing in local USPSA matches. Miguel’s other hobbies are traveling and watch collecting. ### Author social links [LinkedIn]()