IVF expansion was stripped from the NDAA. Here’s your 2026 survival guide.

Loopholes, discounts, and workarounds for military members seeking IVF.
Medical ultrasound, diagnostic sonography or ultrasonography of foliculometry in the protocol of the ivf program in the process of hormonal stimulation
(Natalya Lys)

For military families, the promise of comprehensive reproductive healthcare has long felt like a mirage, always visible on the horizon but forever dissolving as you approach. For the past year, beneficiaries have been led to believe that relief is finally inbound. The Fiscal Year 2026 National Defense Authorization Act included bipartisan language that would have required Tricare to cover In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) for all active-duty service members, finally modernizing a benefit stuck in the Cold War era for decades.

But as the final conference report dropped on Dec. 9, 2025, that provision was nowhere to be found.

It was not lost to a clerical error or a budget oversight, either. It was stripped by House leadership behind closed doors, reportedly due to ideological disputes regarding the status of embryos created during the IVF process. The result is that while members of Congress and federal civil servants enjoy comprehensive fertility coverage, the troops who deploy to defend them do not.

For the average military family, the 2026 landscape is now a little bleaker, leaving them to navigate a broken system with nothing but their own bank accounts and perhaps a few tactical workarounds.

The Financial Scunion

To understand the frustration rippling through the spouse networks, one must look at the math. Excluding this provision not only hurts morale; it also erodes savings accounts. Tricare currently covers only the diagnostic portion of infertility, the labs and exams that identify the problem, but pays zero dollars for the actual treatment unless the service member has a “serious or severe” illness or injury directly caused by their service.

For everyone else, the cost is draining. The average price of one single IVF cycle in the civilian world now runs between $15,000 and $30,000 after factoring in items like medications and genetic testing. Let’s put that into perspective: an E-5 with six years of service takes home a base pay of about $3,800 a month. That means their first attempt to start a family costs almost 75 percent of a sergeant’s annual base pay before taxes.

The Department of Defense is basically asking families to pay a “retention tax” to have children, forcing them to choose between staying in uniform or separating to work for a company like Starbucks, Amazon, or the federal civil service that offers the benefits the military refuses to fund.

The Loophole: MTFs and the “Discount”

If the Pentagon will not pay the bill, families must find a way to hack the system. The most viable workaround is the Military Treatment Facility (MTF) “cost-recovery” program. While Tricare will not cover a civilian clinic, roughly seven military hospitals across the globe offer IVF, in which the professional fees, including the doctors’ and surgery costs, are covered. The patient is responsible only for the contracted laboratory fees and medications, which typically run between $5,000 and $8,000 per cycle, rather than the civilian average of $25,000.

However, accessing these hubs is a logistical nightmare, akin to changing a hot machine-gun barrel with your bare hands. Patients must be stationed near one or get command approval to travel out of pocket.

With 2026 around the corner, the open and operational hubs include Walter Reed National Military Medical Center in Maryland, which serves as the East Coast flagship, with costs around $6,383 plus medications. Brooke Army Medical Center in San Antonio serves the central region but operates on a batched cycle system with a waitlist that can stretch up to a year. Tripler Army Medical Center in Hawaii and Naval Medical Center San Diego handle the Pacific demand, though travel costs often wash out the savings for those not locally stationed.

A critical warning for families in the Pacific Northwest: Madigan Army Medical Center is currently closed to new IVF referrals until at least March 2026 due to severe provider shortages. Relying on outdated referral lists for Madigan will result in dead ends and lost time.

The “Civilian Spouse” Maneuver

Perhaps the most overlooked strategy involves leveraging state law against the federal policy. While Tricare is a federal program exempt from state insurance mandates, civilian employers are not always afforded the same exemption. If a non-active duty spouse secures employment with a company based in a “mandate state“, such as New York, Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey, or Colorado, that employer’s “fully insured” health plan is legally required to cover IVF.

Of course, families should verify with human resources whether a plan is “fully insured” or “self-insured,” since “self-insured” is regulated by federal ERISA laws and often exempt from state mandates.

Pharmaceutical Hacks and Grants

For those forced into the civilian sector, the medication bill alone can rival the cost of a car. Some pharmaceutical companies do offer discount programs that can create a financial tourniquet in dire times. Compassionate Corps provides free fertility medication to eligible veterans with service-connected injuries who lack insurance coverage. For active-duty personnel, ReUnite Assist offers an automatic 25 percent discount on specific medications such as Follistim and Ganirelix, with deeper discounts available based on financial need.

The non-profit sector has also stepped into the breach. The Bob Woodruff Foundation’s VIVA program offers grants of up to $5,000 per cycle for veterans, often covering costs that the VA rejects, such as donor gametes or surrogacy. Baby Quest and the Cade Foundation also provide substantial grants ranging from $2,000 to $16,000 open to active-duty families.

Close-up of in vitro fertilization process with vivid colors
(Rohane Hamilton)

The removal of the IVF provision in the 2026 NDAA is a tactical defeat, but the war is not over. Advocacy groups like the Military Officers Association of America and RESOLVE are already pivoting their strategy for the FY2027 cycle. The argument is shifting from a plea for social benefits to a hard-nosed assessment of readiness. With the military facing historic recruiting challenges, the data suggests it simply cannot afford to bleed mid-career talent because it refuses to support the families it claims to cherish.

Until the policy changes, families must utilize every loophole, apply for every grant, and document every dollar spent. The receipts of 2026 will likely be the ammunition needed to win the fight in 2027. As always, we must do what we do best: adapt and overcome.

Don’t Miss the Best of We Are The Mighty

A brief history of the Army-Navy Game’s special uniforms
8 Signs you grew up a military brat (and are ruined for civilian life)
Air Commandos and the evolution of the ultimate gunship

Adam Gramegna Avatar

Adam Gramegna

Contributor, Army Veteran

Adam enlisted in the Army Infantry three days after the September 11th attacks, beginning a career that took him to Kosovo, Iraq, and Afghanistan twice. Originally from Brooklyn, New York, he now calls Maryland home while studying at American University’s School of Public Affairs. Dedicated to helping veterans, especially those experiencing homelessness, he plans to continue that mission through nonprofit service. Outside of work and school, Adam can be found outdoors, in his bed, or building new worlds in his upcoming sci-fi/fantasy novel.


Learn more about WeAreTheMighty.com Editorial Standards