The views and opinion expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of any entities mentioned.
It is a terrible idea to use military promotions as political bargaining chips yet that’s where we find ourselves on Capitol Hill. The consequences ripple through the lives of service members, military families, and the readiness of the All Volunteer Force itself.
A U.S. Senate hold on hundreds of Coast Guard promotions once again highlights how quickly political fights can disrupt the lives of those who serve this country.
Military promotions are not symbolic. They are part of how the force functions day to day, determining leadership continuity, command structure, and operational readiness, and the stability military families depend on to plan their lives. Even one delayed promotion can create a ripple effect impacting hundreds of service members and their families, not to mention the forever damage to an officer’s career.
Senior military leaders rarely move alone. Commanders often bring with them teams of officers and senior enlisted leaders who create the new command team within a unit, meaning one delayed promotion can stall an entire cohort and chain of leadership moves across the military. Families connected to those transitions are often left in limbo, unsure where they will live, when they will move, or what comes next, often with household goods shipped but with nowhere to go.
Professionally, the consequences can be devastating. Officers who have spent decades progressing alongside the same peer group can suddenly fall behind, altering career trajectories, losing education and promotion windows, and disrupting leadership succession. This disruption can derail and even end otherwise promising careers.
Over the last several years, military promotions have increasingly become tied up in broader political and policy disputes, unrelated to the qualifications of the officers themselves. Regardless of the issue being debated, the people most directly affected are service members and military families who have no role in those disagreements.
The impact reaches far beyond Washington.
A delayed promotion can mean a family sold their house or gave up a lease but now can’t move, so they are functionally homeless. It can mean a spouse quit her job but now can’t take a new one because the family doesn’t know where or when they might move, leaving the family with one income where they had counted on two. It can leave children caught between schools. It can delay pay increases, disrupt career progression, and create uncertainty for families trying to plan their lives around military service.
A 2025 Government Accountability Office report examining the 2023 Senate promotion blockade found that delays affecting 447 military nominees disrupted leadership continuity, delayed career progression, and created challenges for military families, including delayed moves and transitions.
That figure likely understates the true impact by five- or even ten-fold because it does not account for the cascading effects on entire command teams. Military spouse unemployment also continues to remain significantly higher than the national average, due in large part to the instability created by frequent moves and career interruptions.
Military families already navigate a lifestyle built around uncertainty. Delayed promotions and uncertain timelines only add to that strain. Blue Star Families polling conducted during the 2023 promotion hold found that 63% of respondents said the situation decreased their satisfaction with military life, while nearly half said it decreased their likelihood to remain in military service.
Many respondents also expressed concern about the growing politicization of the military and the perception that service members were being caught in broader political battles.
This matters at a time when military leaders continue to raise concerns about recruiting and retention. Blue Star Families’ 2025 Military Family Lifestyle Survey found that only 37% of active-duty family respondents would recommend military service to a family member. Stability and predictability matter more than many people realize.
It is time to put an end once and for all with this blunt and destructive tactic. A coalition of 13 veteran and military service organizations representing millions of service members, veterans, and military families is coming together to urge congressional leadership to keep military promotions separate from broader political negotiations. The letter emphasizes a simple principle: promotions should remain based on the merit and qualifications of the individual service member, not used as leverage in unrelated policy disputes.
That should be something everyone can agree on.
Congress absolutely has an important oversight role. Members of Congress should continue to raise concerns, debate policy priorities, and conduct oversight of the armed forces. But military promotions should not—must not—become leverage in unrelated political disputes. We are calling on members of the Senate to forswear this practice and to reject any of their colleagues’ attempts to do so.
Senior politically appointed civilian officials often understand that politics can affect aspects of their careers. Active duty military leaders operate under a different expectation. Their focus should remain on the mission, the service members under their command, and the national security needs of the country.
When routine military promotions become bargaining tools, it sends the message to the force and to the families who serve alongside them that their civilian leaders do not take their responsibility seriously. Military families should not become collateral damage in political fights taking place far above them.
Congress can preserve its oversight responsibilities while also reinforcing an important principle: military promotions should be about merit, leadership, and readiness, not political leverage.
If you would like to submit an opinion for publication, it must be exclusive to We Are The Mighty. It should be a strong argument about an issue affecting the military, veterans, or the greater military-connected community, between 400 and 1,000 jargon-free words, and submitted as the body of an email rather than an attachment. Send submissions to info@wearethemighty.com. Please include an email address and phone number. We will protect the identities of current military members who wish to publish an opinion.